The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment (two and half years of imprisonment, additional collection, and two years of imprisonment) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The defendants' misjudgments the defendants in depth, and the defendant B agreed with the victim when they reached the trial, and the defendant A deposited money for the victim, etc. are the conditions for sentencing favorable to the defendants.

However, the crime of robbery of this case was committed by the Defendants to force a female victim, who operates a mixed heading house in the middle of the trial, to take money and valuables of the victim who has lost his mind after having melting psychotropic drug ingredients. The nature of the crime is inferior, Defendant A had a criminal record related to several times of narcotics, and carried psychotropic drugs again, and committed any additional robbery by using it. Defendant B committed the crime of this case even though he had been sentenced to 6 years of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Robbery) in 199, and other circumstances such as the Defendants’ age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., comprehensively taking into account the following factors, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.