The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, 40 hours of sexual assault treatment program, 5 years of information disclosure) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Even if the Defendant considers the grounds for appeal by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the lower court appears to have determined the sentence within a reasonable scope, taking full account of all the circumstances regarding sentencing.

B. There are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment.

The defendant's assertion that the sentencing of the court below is unfair shall not be accepted.

B. In light of the details of the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Use and photographing of Cameras, etc.) in ex officio review on the period of registering personal information, and the degree of damage inflicted on the victim due to the crime, the reason taken into account in sentencing, and the aggravation of concurrent crimes, etc., the lower court does not seem to have any circumstance to determine the period of registering personal information more short than the period based on the sentence of sentence pursuant to Article 45(4) of the Act on

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.