A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 5, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 00:40, the Defendant driven Dworka car from the 2km section to the roads front of a gas station in C in the case of drinking water at approximately 2km, in a state of under the influence of alcohol at 0.204%.

Accordingly, the Defendant driven an automobile while under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving)

Defendant 1, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.204% among blood alcohol during the day set forth in the above paragraph 1, driven the above rocketing car in front of the gas station C at the time of drinking, and proceeded at a two-lane distance from the new three-lane boundary, toward the original three-lane distance outflow from the new three-lane boundary, thereby making it impossible for Defendant 1 to know at a two-lane.

There are three-lanes along the straight line of four lanes, where a large number of vehicles are parked and traffic signals are installed on the front side. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to operate the steering and operating the steering system in a safe way by accurately operating the steering and operating the steering system while considering the traffic conditions before, after, after, and after the left.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant was unable to properly operate the steering and brakes while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant got the victim E (26 Do) who is proceeding straight ahead of a four-lane driver’s license, followed by the head of the Frogate, and the pentel part of the Defendant’s car driving car, followed by the Defendant’s driver’s front seat and the pentel part, and suffered the victim from a string wall that requires approximately two-day medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant was injured by driving the above car while it is difficult to drive the car normally due to the influence of drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police of E.