Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 28,445,913 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from May 13, 2016 to February 28, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Pursuant to Article 10 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act"), the Plaintiff is a special corporation established on May 1, 1995 with the aim of contributing to the protection of workers by promptly and fairly compensating for occupational accidents of workers, etc.
B. The non-party A (hereinafter referred to as the "victim") is a daily worker who belongs to the development of modern industry, the non-party B is a driver of C 11.5 tons truck (hereinafter referred to as the "vehicle of this case"), and the non-party D is the owner of the vehicle of this case, and the defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement with D concerning the vehicle of this case
C. At around 09:50 on April 30, 2014, B: (a) around 09:50 on the national expressway E, the PC bank wall (central separation unit) loaded on the instant vehicle was carrying the PC bank wall on the instant vehicle to be unloaded on the slot belt on the ground.
At that time, the victims who had been assisting in loading and unloading operations have suffered an accident (hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case") that exceeds approximately 1.5 meters in height of the PC heading wall, which was slick on the slvet, slved on the left and right, to avoid this.
In the instant accident, the victim suffered from the injury of “the e-mail from the e-mail of the e-mail.”
By May 12, 2016, the Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident and paid KRW 93,184,890 to the victims of temporary layoff benefits, including KRW 31,74,640, medical care benefits 28,450,280, lump-sum disability compensation benefits 32,963,790, etc.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 7, 10, 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Liability for damages and occurrence of the right of indemnity;
A. In the event of transporting loaded goods using a cream, B is found to have taken shelter around a safe place in order to prevent safety accidents caused by the transportation of loaded goods and operated the cream, but is negligent in driving the instant vehicle.