logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.04.23 2013고단2746
강제추행
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the head of the Victim C (Inn, 33 years of age) who is the tenant.

피고인은 2013. 6. 23. 21:00경 서울 강북구 D에 있는 피해자의 집 거실에서 소주를 마시던 중, 피해자의 손을 잡아끌어 피고인의 옆에 앉힌 뒤 피해자의 볼에 입을 맞추고, 손으로 엉덩이를 툭툭 친 다음 피해자의의 옷 위로 가슴을 만지고 젖꼭지를 꼬집었다

(hereinafter referred to as the “first indecent act”). The Defendant: (a) caused the victim to sit the victim’s phone at a small room and toilet by avoiding the Defendant; (b) caused the victim to sit in the toilet to cut back immediately; and (c) caused the victim to sit on the cover of the two sides; and (d) caused the victim’s bucks by inserting the hand on the bridge between the victim and the victim’s bucks.

(hereinafter referred to as the second indecent act) thereby, the Defendant committed indecent act by force against the victim.

2. Determination

A. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court.

1) C, while making several calls from the Defendant and making several calls to the parents, C did not inform the parents of the fact that he was committing an indecent act from the Defendant. 2) On the day immediately after the Defendant was committed with the second indecent act by the Defendant, C, as seen above, continued to take the Defendant’s defective drinking that the Defendant would wish to drink, thereby doing so.

3) After the completion of the drinking place between the Defendant and the Defendant, C did not notify the Defendant’s wife of the indecent act against the Defendant by either the Defendant’s wife, or the Defendant’s wife’s fighting against the Defendant’s wife, but did not notify the Defendant’s wife of the indecent act. 4) C is a director at all times to C’s family at ordinary times, on the grounds that the Defendant did not actively resist the Defendant, and at ordinary times, the Defendant would be a director.

arrow