logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.09.14 2016구합1438
토지수용에 대한 보상금 증액청구의소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,886,00 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 9, 2016 to September 14, 2017, and the following.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business Name B (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): A public notice given at the Jeonju City (as of June 29, 2012), and D public notice at the Jeonju (as of March 4, 2016) - Business Name: Defendant

B. Decision on expropriation made on April 27, 2016 by the Provincial Land Tribunal of Jeollabuk-do: The date of expropriation: June 20, 2016 - The subject matter of expropriation and the subject matter of compensation land: The details of compensation indicated below the Plaintiff’s ownership (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant lands”), totaling the compensation amount of KRW 130,447,000,000, 2347,000,000, 2347,000,000, 810,000, Dajin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 1347,447,000, 509, 898,000, 000, the sum of the compensation amount of KRW 6047,007,260,208, 307, 307, 407, 3005

C. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff operated a Domin factory and a storage warehouse (hereinafter “instant factory”) on the land, including each of the instant land, in the name of I. However, the instant factory itself was not expropriated in the instant project, but some auxiliary facilities, such as the management office, staff accommodation, rest area, and restaurant on each of the instant land.

At the time of the adjudication of expropriation of this case, the Plaintiff asserted that the remaining land of this case was expropriated and the remaining land alone could not operate the factory of this case, and that the factory of this case would compensate for business losses. The Plaintiff asserted that there was a considerable period of time for re-construction of facilities meeting the permission standards to obtain the permission of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, and that the factory of this case

However, since the Special Self-Governing Province Land Tribunal of Jeollabuk-do, a major business facility of this case, was not expropriated, it is possible to operate the business, and it is possible to rearrange the office, staff accommodation, rest room, restaurant, etc. to the remaining land without relocation of the factory.

arrow