[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the trust of the C church, the defendant B is the children of D, which is the member of the above church, and the victim E is the member of the F church and the vice-chairperson of G.

On July 24, 2016, at around 10:30 to 11:00, the Defendants: (a) had the C church’s three-story worship room located in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, and (b) had the victim spawnddd down to the river group by having the victim spawnd, and (c) had the victim spawnd from the river group to the river group; (b) had the victim spawnddd from the river group to the Defendant B, and had the victim satd from the river group.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victims and put the victim with multiple scopic scopic scopic scopics that require treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Some statements concerning the Defendants in the police interrogation protocol

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Ethical certificate of injury;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to three-story video CDs ( July 24, 2016)

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (elective of penalty) concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement in a workhouse (the time when a sentence of suspension of execution is invalidated or revoked in case of Defendant B);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the suspended execution (Article 62 of the Criminal Act) (Article 62(1) of the same Act (Article 62(1) of the same Act does not affect the conclusion of the defendant B’s act in the occurrence of the victim’s injury;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The victim had already been injured in the process of taking the stairs before the Defendants’ act, and thus, it is not recognized that the Defendants’ act and injury are in a causal relationship.

(b) There was no intention or conspiracy of injury.

(c)

The victim interferes with the worship of the victim.