Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months and 2 years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is deeply divided and reflected in his/her depth; (b) the primary offender who has no record of criminal punishment; and (c) the Defendant’s family and branch members wanting to take the Defendant’s wife against the Defendant.

However, perjury is a crime that damages the appropriateness of judicial procedure. The crime of this case is a false statement that the defendant made a false statement that goes against memory on several occasions, and the liability for the crime of this case is grave. The scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee established by the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, and the crime of perjury is not recognized as improper considering all kinds of sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the circumstances of the crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.