The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (four years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant has been growing up in an influent family environment; (b) the fact that the Defendant appears to have committed a crime in an economically poor situation immediately after release; (c) the amount of damage was not large; and (d) the confession of all crimes and reflects them.

However, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, and the special robbery was prepared for the stolen decline, and planned five times through convenience stores for female victims who had been married at night or night. In light of the law and frequency of the crime, the nature of the crime is inferior, and the defendant is not available to victims up to now. Considering such circumstances, the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee, the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court, the defendant's age and character, the motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime before and after the crime, the punishment of the court below is not determined unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.