The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. There is no erroneous determination of the facts regarding the crime of intimidation by the Defendant. There is no fact that the Defendant threatened the victim E.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's duly adopted and examined evidence, i.e., the fact that the defendant had a knife knife at the time of the instant crime; ② the victim E shows knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

3. The defendant's health is not good, the fact that the defendant seems to be against the majority of the facts charged, such as the recognition of most of the facts charged, is advantageous. However, the defendant has a record of having been punished several times of imprisonment for the same kind of crime in August 2008, October 2006, and August 2003 by imprisonment for the same crime, and eight months in 203, and the defendant has been punished by imprisonment for the same crime. The defendant injured the victim I with a beer disease by damaging the beer, and threatened the victim E with a deadly weapon without any reason. As above, the defendant threatened and threatened the victim E with a deadly weapon without any reason, such as the injury and intimidation, and the use of a deadly weapon such as the soft disease, the fact that the nature of the crime was extremely poor, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the circumstances and result of the crime in this case, and all the circumstances revealed in this case after the crime.