logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.11.16 2017고정134
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 200,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who actually operates the said establishment as G’s wife, a representative of F, from the first floor of the underground floor of the building located in Go Chang-gun E.

On January 1, 2017, the Defendant, at around 20:00, committed the act of arranging sexual traffic, such as having male customers H receive KRW 90,00 from male customers and having female employees B and sexual intercourse, etc.

2. Defendant B, on January 1, 2017, who was employed by the foregoing “F” business establishment around 20:05, and found the said business establishment, and the customer H engaged in sexual intercourse once in return for 90,000 won to the said person as the broker for sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol to H;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Article 19(1)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts by Defendant A (the point of arranging commercial sex acts and the selection of fines)

B. Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts by Defendant B (the occupation of commercial sex acts and the selection of fines)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act of the above order for provisional payment are as follows: (a) although the Defendants denied the commission of a crime by an investigative agency, the Defendants were committed in this court; (b) the Defendants were the primary offenders; and (c) the Defendants were the primary offenders; and (d) the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of a crime; and (d) the conditions for sentencing specified in the arguments of the instant case, including the circumstances after the commission

arrow