The 1st and 6th of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of the 1st to eth of the judgment of the defendant, the 1th of the judgment, and the 2.0th of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On January 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc.

8. 22. The judgment became final and conclusive on July 12, 201, and on December 8, 201, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, which became final and conclusive on April 30, 2012, the execution of the sentence was completed at the Child Training Institution on April 30, 2012. On September 30, 2016, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, and the sentence became final and conclusive on October 8, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Fraud (2015 highest 962);

A. On January 25, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the DaB's Legal Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, that the Defendant did not have a right to sell D apartment 205, and the Defendant did not have a right to sell D apartment 205, and thus, the Defendant did not have an intent or ability to sell it. However, the Defendant made a false statement to the DaE that “it has a right to sell D apartment 205,” which is the forest size of 997 square meters and a substitute exchange in the Jung-gu, Incheon.”

On February 12, 2008, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) concluded a real estate sales contract with DH designated by the Defendant on February 12, 2008; and (c) obtained by deception the above real estate equivalent to KRW 150 million at the market price on July 2, 2010.

B. On February 18, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the DaB's Legal Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, that the Defendant did not have the right to sell DDA 703 and 1006, and that the Defendant did not have the right to sell, but did not have the right to sell, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to sell the DDA 703 and 1006, the Defendant held the right to sell the Do apartment 703 and 1006. As such, the Defendant made a false statement to the DoE as described in the above paragraph (a).

On February 1, 2008, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and caused the victim to enter into a contract for the sale of real estate with the DJ et al. designated by the defendant.