logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.27 2014가합26298
컨설팅용역비
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 171,00,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its amount from May 28, 2014 to September 30, 2015.

Reasons

(b) Realizing non-loan management 1-2) about 3 business places: Financial restructuring 1,3 business places and free loan management consulting 1-3). Consulting 1-4) management structure improvement, such as capital increase for new shares, CB, and BW issuance: Consulting 1-4) management structure improvement, publicly notified by the current management: - Han Investment Partnership, AB investment, new financial investment, SB investment, new financial investment, SBIB investment, SB Investment, over-the-art, over-counter securities, foreign currency securities, teaching guarantee, etc.

1. The duration of this Agreement is about nine months from the date of the contract.

(Contract Period: From September 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014)

2.Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraph 1 above, the term of contract may be extended by an agreement between "A" and "B".

The price for consulting services referred to in Article 5 (Methods of Remuneration and Payment) shall be 2.5% of the amount of restructuring and financial consulting services, and shall be paid according to the following schedule after a contract for restructuring, financial consulting services, etc. is concluded:

* If a purchaser sells an outstanding balance of KRW 7,442,052,132 from November 16, 2013 to December 16, 2013, either (i) payment by 30% on October 16, 2013, and (ii) payment by 70% on the date of the completion of the payment of the remainder of KRW 10% on Article 10 (Matters of Special Agreement) “A,” the financial expenses for the pertinent period (interest, etc.) shall be subtracted from the remuneration of “B.”

On November 16, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract on the disposal of tangible assets with the sale of the entire land and the entire land buildings (land: 19,960 square meters, buildings: 11,046.49 square meters, and hereinafter “instant business establishment”) in Seocho-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, a “one business place” and the Defendant entered into a contract on the disposal of the instant property (hereinafter “instant disposal contract”).

The defendant was paid KRW 11.8 billion from the sales price of the place of business of this case by Egyp S.

The Defendant’s payment for consulting services to the Plaintiff amounting to KRW 50 million on January 24, 2014, and the same year.

2. A total of KRW 100,000,000 was paid.

[Ground of recognition] A.

arrow