beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On August 19, 2005, at around 16:35, around 2005, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operated the said vehicle in a state where the 1 axis is loaded with freight exceeding 10 tons of a limited weight exceeding 10 tons on B truck owned by the Defendant, thereby violating the restriction on vehicle operation.
2. As to Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995); or Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); or Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 10655, Dec. 24, 2011; Act No. 10653, Dec. 14, 2011; Act No. 10688, Dec. 31, 2005; Act No. 8677, Mar. 21, 2017.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.