logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.08.30 2018나52974
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is the representative of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Plaintiff Co., Ltd.") who sells bus sound equipment, and the defendant is the director of D Co., Ltd.

Although the Defendant decided to recommend reconciliation of KRW 1 million to the Plaintiff Company by 2016Da231758, which many tourist bus articles joined as a member, the Defendant damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation and interfered with the Plaintiff’s business, such as writing out a written examination against the Plaintiff on the same Ban, etc., even though it became final and conclusive that the D Union paid KRW 1 million to the Plaintiff Company.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 20 million won and damages for delay due to tort.

B. According to the overall purport of the Plaintiff’s statement and pleading No. 2, the Plaintiff Company’s 2016da231758 of this Court’s 2016da231758, when it filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages against the Plaintiff by “E NA, etc.” and filed a lawsuit claiming compensation for damages against the Plaintiff, thereby impairing the reputation of the Plaintiff Company, and obstructing its operation, it is acknowledged that the D Cooperatives paid KRW 1 million to the Plaintiff Company around January 2017, and there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation and interfered with its business solely on the basis of each statement of evidence Nos. 1 through 7.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow