The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: A, an employee of the Defendant, operated a B vehicle at around 06:19 on March 31, 2006 at the south Incheon Business Office located at around 12.13 km in the direction of the development of the 2nd Highway at around 06:19 on March 31, 2006, and thus, the Defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation by a road management authority.

On the other hand, the prosecutor prosecuted the facts charged of this case by applying Articles 86, 83(1)2 and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008), and the summary order of KRW 70,000 was notified and finalized in this court.

However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, Article 86 of the above Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence provided for in Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine provided for in the corresponding Article shall be imposed on the corporation, the corporation shall also be imposed on the violation of the Constitution (Supreme Court Order 2008HunGa17 Decided July 30, 2009). The above provision of the above Act, which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, has retroactively lost its effect.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.