1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 56,100,000 as well as 20% per annum from January 14, 2014 to the day of full payment.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was supplied by the Defendant and constructed it on the apartment site B, and there was a defect that foreign substances flown out in the above double-story glass, and due to the above defect, the Plaintiff removed the above double-story glass constructed, manufactured a new double-story glass, and constructed it again, and the costs totaled to KRW 56,100,000. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages for the above double-story glass’s defect and damages for delay.

B. Defendant’s assertion 1) The Defendant received an order from the Plaintiff for the production of a double-story glass, and supplied a double-story glass at the building site, and there was no supply of a double-story glass at the apartment site B of Daewoo Construction. The Plaintiff filed a claim for damages due to the defect of the double-story glass constructed at the apartment site B of Daewoo Construction. This is not the construction site supplied by the Defendant, and it is not the construction site supplied by the Defendant, and the Defendant cannot comply with the Plaintiff’s claim. 2) The Defendant manufactured and supplied the double-story glass as ordered by the Plaintiff, and was examined by the Plaintiff during the supply process, but there was no defect at that time.

또한 피고는 신우화학공업 주식회사로부터 접착제 등을 구매하여 이 사건 복층유리를 제작하였는데, 피고와 신우화학공업 주식회사 사이의 접착제 등 물품대금청구소송(인천지방법원 2014가소5695호)에서 실시된 복층유리의 하자 발생 원인에 대한 감정절차에서 감정인이 판단이 어렵다는 이유로 사퇴하였고, 복층유리의 중앙의 공기가 들어 있는 부분에 이물질이 흘러내리는 현상이 발생했다고 하더라도 이것이 두 개의 유리를 붙일 때 사용하는 2차 실링재의 불량 때문인지 아니면 제작된 복층유리를 샷시 등에 붙일 때 사용하는 3차 실란트의 불량 때문인지 확인할 수 없다....