logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.10 2015나2056299
퇴직금 청구의 소
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall set up the annexed retirement allowance calculation sheet to the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant”) is a company that engages in credit investigation business, debt collection business, etc. with a credit information business license granted by the Financial Services Commission pursuant to the Use and Protection of Credit Information Act.

B. The Plaintiffs entered into a business delegation agreement with the Defendant on the first day of each service period indicated in the separate sheet for the calculation of retirement allowances (hereinafter “instant business delegation agreement”) and were in charge of collecting claims that the Defendant accepted from creditors during the said service period, and retired at the end of the said service period.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's Nos. 1 and 2 (if there is an additional number, including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleading

2. The parties' assertion

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that, although they were employed by the defendant company in the form of delegation contract, they are actually directed and supervised by the defendant in performing their duties and provided their labor to the defendant in a subordinate relationship with the purpose of wages, and thus, the defendant is obligated to pay each money as stated in the "request amount" in the attached retirement allowance calculation sheet in accordance with the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act

B. The summary of the defendant's assertion 1 did not manage the plaintiffs' attitude or provide specific work instructions in relation to debt collection, and only provided work places and fixtures so that the plaintiffs can smoothly perform delegated affairs.

The plaintiffs received fees in proportion to debt collection performance without the basic pay or fixed pay, and it cannot be viewed as wages due to the fact that the amount is large for each plaintiff and each period, and that the amount is determined depending on the quantity and quality of labor provided.

Therefore, the Plaintiffs.

arrow