A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On the fifth floor of D Public Notice in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 8, 2015, at around 17:00, the Defendant: (a) called the victim E who had suffered emotional injury by drinking alcohol as before a month; and (b) called the victim E by finding out the room of the victim; (c) d Public Notice No. 17:00 on November 8, 2015; and (d) d Public Notice No. 300; and (c) d Public Notice No. 301, May 1, 2015;

H. “D..........”

The victim threatened the victim by taking a knife knife 17 cm in length, which is a dangerous object in the host of the Knife, “Arife knife knife knife knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife in the host of the Knife.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of criminal implements;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., circumstances favorable to the defendant) are asserted to the effect that the defendant was in a state of mental and physical weakness due to drinking of drinking of drinking of drinking with the mental medicine at the time of the crime in this case. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant was suffering from mental illness such as repeated depression, cardiossissis, cardiossissis, and spathy, etc. at the time of the crime in this case, and he recovered from the mental medicine, although he was found to have performed alcohol, it cannot be seen that the defendant and his defense counsel lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions. Thus, the above argument by the defendant and his defense counsel is rejected.

The reason for sentencing is against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, and is the same as the crime of this case.