logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.03.25 2019나315705
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendants cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and in full view of the evidence submitted in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are

Accordingly, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following portions, and therefore, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

(B) However, according to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B did not pay more than three cars according to the instant lease agreement. As to the part concerning the request for delivery of the D cafeteria, the part concerning the O height from the second page of the judgment of the first instance to the “(Article 8).”

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate. Thus, the defendants' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

However, Article 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance was modified in accordance with the reduction of the purport of the claim in this court.

arrow