1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the Plaintiff’s KRW 153,682,340 against the Defendant and its related amount from March 5, 2016 to October 17, 2018.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, on the grounds that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial dismissal.

2. The part to be mard;

A. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the first instance has changed the “satisfy” of the thirdh to “satisfyfy”.

B. Then, the phrase “30%” of the judgment of the first instance is 40% [the plaintiff is also 40% of the net B at the time of filing the lawsuit of this case (the 4 pages of the complaint of this case). However, on the premise that the net B’s negligence on January 8, 2018 is 30%, the plaintiff calculated the amount of damages by adding the phrase “70% of the defendant’s liability” under the premise that “30% of the insurance money of this case is 50%” and the phrase “50% of the above 40% of the insurance money of this case is 50% of the insurance money of this case’s 140,114,954 won [the 200,164,220 x 70% of the defendant’s liability ratio x 70% of the total amount of damages].