logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.01.17 2016나6927
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance, and each evidence submitted by the court of first instance is acknowledged as legitimate even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is based on the following reasoning: (a) the evidence additionally submitted in the trial and lack of recognition of the Defendant's assertion is rejected as evidence Nos. 9 through 11 (including paper numbers); and (b) except for addition of the judgment below, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance; and (c) thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Although the defendant prepared a confirmation document that the plaintiff remitted money to the defendant's passbook but invested in C, the defendant asserts that he paid money to the defendant in this case is contrary to the principle of good faith. However, the circumstance that the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim in this case is contrary to the principle of good faith, it is difficult to view that

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow