beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Plaintiff’s assertion
Around February 2, 2012, the purport of the judgment is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff was offered by the Defendant to sell to the Plaintiff at the auction bid of Soyang-gu Seoul apartment 510 Dong 1604 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) under the name of D; and (b) from January 11, 2012 to September 25, 2012, the Plaintiff delivered KRW 92,134,520 in total to the Defendant under the name of auction balance, registration tax, etc.; and (c) the expenses actually incurred by the Defendant under the said name are not more than KRW 63,81,569 in total, as indicated in the same Table.
According to the loan interest of 5,400,000,000 47,770,000 for the actual expenses actually incurred by the Plaintiff, 2,100,000,000 for loan interest of 5,400,000,797,259 2,100,000 for the remainder of the successful bid price of 2,100,100,000 for the first owners of 2,460,460,00 for the first owners of 2,460,00 for the first owners of 2,460,00 for the first owners of 2,460,00 for the first owners of 2,460,00 for the first owners of 2,159,310,005,210,07,05,000 for the transfer of ownership,52,134,520,63,81,569 for the remainder of the successful bid price, the Plaintiff is equivalent to 25365.
The plaintiff transferred the total amount of KRW 67,80,00 to the defendant from January 11, 2012 to May 29, 2012, the total amount of KRW 67,80,000 to the defendant, KRW 2,90,00 on September 18, 2012, KRW 21,434,520 on the account in the name of D around September 25, 2012, KRW 92,134,520 on the aggregate of KRW 21,434,520 on the account in the name of D around September 25, 2012, the defendant's bid price of KRW 47,770,00 on the above amount was the successful bid price of the apartment in this case, KRW 7,05,00 on the registration tax and judicial scrivener's expenses, KRW 2,00,000 on the total amount of KRW 959,310 on the owner of the apartment in this case.
Furthermore, as alleged by the Plaintiff, whether the Defendant acquired the money from the Plaintiff by means of claiming for the reimbursement of the actual cost as alleged by the Plaintiff is sufficient, and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is alone.