logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.01 2015노2404
사기
Text

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the crime No. 4, 5, and 6 of the attached crime list No. 1-A of the judgment of the court below is related to the crime.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each punishment of the court below against the defendant (the crime No. 1-A of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 1-A of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 1-2 of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 1-2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the crime No. 1-2 of the judgment of the court of first instance: Imprisonment with prison labor and six months, and the crime No. 4,5, and six of the judgment of the court of first instance in the annexed crime No. 1-A of the judgment of the court of first instance: Imprisonment with prison labor and imprisonment with prison labor

2. Determination:

A. Of the judgment of the court below of first instance, the part concerning the crime No. 4, 5, and 6 in the annexed crime No. 1-A among the crimes in the annexed crime No. 1-A and the judgment of the court of second instance on the judgment of the court of second instance was rendered, and the judgment of the court below was rendered, and the defendant filed each appeal against this. The court decided to hold the above two appeals jointly.

In this regard, after the judgment on the crime of fraud in the judgment of the court below becomes final and conclusive, the crime No. 1-A. 4, 5, and 6 of the judgment of the court below in the judgment of the court of first instance, and the crime of the resolution of the court of second instance in the judgment of the court of first instance in the annexed crime No. 4, 5, and 6 and the crime of the resolution of the judgment of the court of second instance in the annexed crime

Therefore, among the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the crime No. 4, 5, and 6 in the annexed crime No. 1-A and the judgment of the court of second instance cannot be maintained as they are.

B. Of the judgment of the court below No. 1-A, the crime No. 1-2 and No. 1-2 of the judgment of the court below relating to the crime No. 1-2 and the crime No. 1-2 of the judgment of the court of first instance as to each of the crimes No. 2 of the crime and the crime No. 2 of the judgment below (i.e., the crime of this case was not sufficiently capable of performing the obligation of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) it operated by the defendant, and the crime of this case was committed by G Co., Ltd. with respect to H (hereinafter “the construction of this case”) ordered by the Korea Water Resources Corporation (hereinafter “the construction of this case”), and the possibility of the conclusion of the contract was unclear.

arrow