logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.24 2016가합540637
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 2014, D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) entered into a contract for acquisition of stocks, etc., including the stocks that A’s in-house director E and F acquire all assets, such as stocks and management rights, and D’s representative G substantially operated D’s management.

B. 1) D Co., Ltd. entered into the instant supply contract with A on April 30, 2015, indicated D as “92,500,500 won” (excluding value-added tax, and “982,50,000,000 won” in the goods supply contract with A, but it is obvious that D is a clerical error.

A) The supply shall be made to A, and D shall be KRW 300,000,000 as the advance payment for a contract, and D shall obtain a surety insurance policy for the said advance and submit it to A (hereinafter “instant supply contract”).

(2) On June 11, 2015, D concluded an advance payment performance guarantee insurance contract under the instant supply contract (hereinafter “instant guarantee insurance contract”) with the Defendant and issued it to A with the performance guarantee policy stating the following:

The insured: The insurance coverage period of KRW 300,000: From June 10, 2015 to September 30, 2015: The coverage period of KRW 300,000: From June 10, 2015 to September 30, 2015: The payment guarantee of the amount calculated by subtracting unpaid progress payment from the advance payment amount equivalent to the part of the principal contract) A paid KRW 300,000,000 under the instant supply contract to D on June 11, 2015.

C. A complaint filed against G on January 2016 against G is suspected of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement). A complaint is filed by the complainant, and “Defendant Party (G)” only takes over the complainant company (A) as a contract and did not change the shares and executive officers.

arrow