The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On March 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received a civil judgment from the public service center of the Ulsan Police Station located in the Ulsan Police Station located in the Ulsan-si, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do; (b) that the Defendant is obligated to pay the victim C the amount of KRW 1,1290,000 for rice straw (Seoul District Court Young-gu District Court Young-gu Branch Branch 2010 Ghana Branch 1646); (c) on September 2009, the Defendant prepared a cash storage certificate (the five pages of evidence record; hereinafter “the cash storage certificate of this case”) verifying that the Defendant is obligated to pay the victim C the amount of KRW 1,68,00 for rice straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw 28,000; and (d) submitted it to the court for the purpose of having the victim subject to criminal punishment.

2. The summary of the Defendant’s and the defense counsel’s assertion stated that the Defendant’s assertion “a confirmation confirming that all rice straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw straw st

Ultimately, since the Defendant did not have any impediment to the cash custody certificate of this case, the Defendant did not submit a false complaint as stated in the facts charged of this case and did not dismiss C.

3. Determination

A. C stated in an investigative agency and this court that “the Defendant was stamped to directly interfere with the instant cash custody certificate,” and D stated in an investigative agency and this court to the effect that “C read the content of the instant cash custody certificate to the Defendant and the Defendant had a direct interference with the instant cash custody certificate.”

B. The cash custody certificate of this case is written by C, including the signature of the defendant, and is likely to obstruct the name of the defendant, and is stamped by the investigative agency.