Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. The Defendants in the facts charged have been engaged in the 6th floor of G building in Ansan-gu F and the 7th floor H H Bana (hereinafter “Sarina”) in Ansan-gu (hereinafter “Sarina in this case”), Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D, respectively.

On January 28, 2014, the Defendants also prepared and submitted a false complaint to I and J through the attorney-at-law in the public service center of the police station having jurisdiction over the Gyeonggi-gu Mancheon-ro 63 (Mayang-dong).

A written complaint stating that “The complainants appointed the Defendant Sarier I, including the complainants, who leased various services from the instant Saria and operated the instant services, as the representative for the negotiation with the KArier, a lessor, around August 2007. On September 1, 2007, appointed the KArier, a lessor, as the auditor, and delegated the right to negotiate with the KArier, a lessor. On September 1, 2007, appointed the Defendant Sarier, as the auditor, to perform the instant friendship, operation, and accounting audit, and let the Defendant Nonparty Nonparty enter into any agreement with the KArier, and obtained prior approval from the service personnel, including the complainants.

The private loan holders, including complainants, agreed to the agreement on September 1, 2007 that "K shall recognize the service deposits of the private loan holders, including the complainants, and have them operate the business in the private loan, but the private loan holders shall not claim the return of the service deposit to K until it reaches the final amount of KRW 3 billion which is the loan funds of the K in charge of the K in charge of the K in charge of the settlement of the private loan and the construction fund, which shall not be claimed by the private loan holders until it reaches the final amount of KRW 3 billion which is the loan funds of the K in charge of the L in charge of the settlement of the private loan holders (hereinafter "the agreement on September 1, 2007"). However, in the course of conducting the negotiation with the K in violation of their duties, the defendants shall be jointly and severally and severally agreed to all the service parties, including the complainants, to the K in charge of the settlement of the private loan holders.