logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.11.06 2020고단5867
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in Daegu District Court and racing support.

Nevertheless, at around 20:58 on August 15, 2020, the Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of drinking in such a way that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, b1:17, around 21:24, around 21:30, around 21:35, around 21:35, and about 18:4 minutes between approximately 18 minutes and approximately 18 minutes in total.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to comply with a police officer’s demand for the measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds by evading it by means of making it impossible for the Defendant to take a sobsing in the breath of the drinking measuring instrument, such as making the breath of the breath of the breath,

As a result, the Defendant again refused to take a alcohol test even though he had been punished for a drunk driving, and violated it more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on detection of suspected victims of violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement), reporting on internal investigation (Evidence No. 21 pages), and photographs at the time of control;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Records of judgment: Application of one copy of criminal records, reply note, and summary order;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1), 44 (2) and (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the crime of this case is that the defendant has a record of driving alcohol and drives alcohol while driving alcohol.

arrow