1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The Defendant’s “cerebrovascular” against the Plaintiff on March 25, 2014.

1. The court's explanation on this part of the grounds for appeal is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The court's explanation of this part of the plaintiff's assertion is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Since it is the same as the statement in the claim, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The court's explanation on this part of the relevant statutes is based on the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance 2. B.

Since it is the same as the statement in the claim, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

C. Grounds for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts of recognition are as follows. 2. Grounds for appeal of the first instance judgment

C. The grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) add the following in front of the "(based on recognition") which is the part of the evidence of the fact; (b) add the words "(based on recognition”; (c) add the words "A No. 11-1, 2, and 3; (d) the witness D's testimony; and (e) the fact-finding results with respect to the head of the Korea University Cancer Hospital at the time of the trial court."

Since it is the same as the statement in the claim, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Applicant The inspection work performed by the plaintiff, such as the daily verification of whether the windows are opened or closed, such as the working environment, is subject to stress.

In particular, it is necessary to repeat the operation of turning-on and turning-on operation for the inspection of completed vehicles even though the entrance part of the workplace where the new tally tally tally is installed is obstructed, so it is a part exposed to exhaust gas.

Before the instant accident, the Plaintiff had been able to return to work after receiving a wood operation as an industrial accident, and thus, the Plaintiff was unable to perform the completion vehicle inspection work on the grounds of exhaust gas, drilling, and cryption in winter.

(v) the applicant;