logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.12 2017구합68982
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 63,475,200 to Plaintiff A; KRW 13,932,00 to Plaintiff B; KRW 1,520,00 to Plaintiff C; and KRW 4,120 to Plaintiff D.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) A business title - Business name: An urban planning facility project (F Corporation) - the project site: a project site: a project site: An urban planning facility project site (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): A project site: Bri, H, and Iriwon (J: 8,274m2, K: 6,571m2): Defendant - A project approval: A project approval L on July 1, 2015.

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on March 9, 2017 - The date of expropriation: each land indicated in the column for “land subject to expropriation” in the attached Table owned by the Plaintiffs located in the project area of the instant case (hereinafter “instant land”): Compensation: must be calculated as indicated in the attached Table “Adjudication on Expropriation Compensation” column - An appraisal corporation: T&Bnan appraisal corporation, K&T appraisal corporation, and Gan appraisal corporation, Inc. (hereinafter “Expropriations”) (hereinafter “Expropriations”) and the said appraisal is referred to as “adjudication on expropriation”).

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on August 24, 2017 - Compensation: It shall be calculated as indicated in the “compensation amount of the instant ruling” in the attached Table attached hereto - An appraisal corporation: the State Appraisal Corporation, the Central Appraisal Corporation, and the Central Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Objectioned Appraisal”) (hereinafter “Objectioned Appraisal”), and the said appraisal is referred to as “appraisal of the objection”).

D. As a result of the fact-finding inquiry conducted on March 19, 2018, the court appraiser conducted the fact-finding inquiry conducted on March 19, 2018 to the effect that the appraisal results of the appraiser M (hereinafter “court appraiser M”) and the supplementary appraisal results, the court appraiser determined the appraised value of 1,102 square meters of 730,626,00 won from the 771,40,000 won.

(hereinafter referred to as "the results of the court appraisal" and the results of the inquiry conducted on March 19, 2018 - The results of the court appraisal - The evaluation conducted as shown in the column of the court appraisal - The fact that there is no dispute as to the evaluation conducted as shown in the table of the attached Table of "the grounds for recognition", Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the court appraisal conducted by the court appraiser, the whole purport of the pleadings.

2. As to the plaintiffs' assertion of this case's land

arrow