A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the representative of the “E” published the National Public Relations Office for D and monthly, took advantage of the fact that the name and F, which is the relative of the former president, are similar to those of F, a relative of the former president, was committed as if he had a considerable influence on the president and Cheongdae, etc., the Defendant created an organization called the “G Promotion Committee”. The Defendant had held a presidential commemorative event under the name of the said Promotion Committee to receive money from each institution, company, organization, individual, etc. under the pretext of support payments.

1. Fraud against victim H;

A. On December 10, 2014, the accused of fraud in the name of the two-year anniversary anniversary anniversary of the presidential appointment, was introduced through a seal at a place in a Buddhist place on December 10, 2014, “The Defendant prepared the 2-year anniversary anniversary anniversary of the presidential appointment, and borrowed the charge for the facility rental. This event is held and the expenses incurred in the events held in D from the cultural sports tourism (department of cultural sports tourism) are paid as support payments, and will be refunded when the principal is paid thereafter.

The former president was present at the time of marriage in the Republic of Korea, with the former president-friendly relationship, while the former president was aware of his or her excessive fact in the Republic of Korea.

The phrase, “this event”, and there is no concern about whether the report was made to L.

“In the event that the injured party first pays the expenses for the event, the Defendant received support payments from the Ministry of Culture and Tourism and returned them, and acted as if he could have an impact on the victim’s business by using the connection, such as the president’s relatives, etc.

However, the facts do not have any relationship with the president, and even if the two-year anniversary anniversary of the presidential appointment, the Defendant did not have the ability or qualification to receive support from the Ministry of Culture Sports Tourism or to exercise certain influence on the government, and did not know L, and did not have any intention or ability to help the victim's business.

Ultimately, the Defendant is equal to this.