The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, and three of the mobile phones acquired through deception was temporarily returned to the victims and partly recovered from the damage.

However, it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of all the conditions of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., including the fact that the nature of the crime was inferior in light of the Act on the Acceptance of Crimes, the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime, and the crime of forging and uttering of forged public documents only stipulates the statutory punishment, and that the term of punishment is deemed to have been determined by considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit.