1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 18, 2007, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a sojourn status for visiting employment (H-2) by using a passport (hereinafter “B”) under the name of “B (C”) on December 18, 2007, and left the Republic of Korea on December 9, 2010. On December 18, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a sojourn status for visiting employment by using a first passport again on December 18, 2010, and left the Republic of Korea on October 20, 2012.

B. 1) On May 7, 2013, the Plaintiff issued a passport in the name of “D (E)” (hereinafter “B/L”) (hereinafter “B/L”).

(C-3) A short-term visit (C-3) entry into the Republic of Korea on May 27, 2013, and departure from the Republic of Korea on July 29, 2013, using a passport issued on July 29, 2013, and entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit sojourn status on October 21, 2013, and after entering the Republic of Korea on October 21, 2013, by using a passport issued on October 21, 2013, on January 2, 2014, the entry into the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit sojourn status using a passport issued on March 6, 2014, and thereafter entered the Republic of Korea as a visiting employment status on February 6, 2017, using a passport issued on March 7, 2017, and left the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit sojourn status on May 25, 2017.

3) In addition, on September 20, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as the status of Visit employment by using the passport issued on September 20, 2017. (c) The Defendant, on November 14, 2017, discovered that the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea using a passport issued on another’s name, and discovered the fact that the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea using a passport issued on November 14, 2017, and on November 16, 2017, issued a deportation order against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[The facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 3 and 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is in the past another person's name.