The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-misunderstanding that the defendant suffered injury due to each traffic accident as stated in the judgment below (hereinafter "each traffic accident of this case"). The insurance money claimed and received by the insurance company is the advance payment and the insurance money is made to be settled by considering the last king certificate at the time of the final agreement, and there is no obligation to notify the defendant of the " king" in advance payment, and at the time of the defendant's request for advance payment, the defendant has agreed to use the personal information so that he can be used for the investigation, such as the defendant's king certificate, etc. In light of these circumstances,

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) However, in full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court can fully recognize the Defendant’s criminal intent of deception or deception.

A) Prior to the occurrence of each of the instant traffic accidents, the Defendant was hospitalized in T Hospital twice from September 29, 201 to October 5, 2011, and from November 22, 201 to November 30, 201, with the “scopical signboard escape certificate (e.g., 4-5 livers, 5 - 1,00), scopical spine, scopical base, and 1-2 scopical base,” and (2) on October 10, 201, the Defendant received treatment of 1-2 scopic signboard escape certificate (e.g., 4-5 copical base, 5 mopical base, 1-2 mopical base, 1-3 mopical base, and 2-1 mopical base,” and received treatment of 1-2 mopic mopical base from the hospital.

(2) On June 1, 2012, the Defendant is from “U Rehabilitation Department Members.”