The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part written by the court as described in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Each “this Court” in the first instance court shall be added to “the first instance court” in the 5th sentence of the first instance judgment, 17, 7, 19, 13, and 14.

B. On January 31, 2018, the part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the relationship with Dong implementation” in the part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the relationship with Dong implementation” in the part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be construed as “the relationship with Dong implementation,” “liability for Non-performance of Obligations” in the part 12, “liability for Non-performance of Obligations” in the part 13, “ around January 31, 2018”.

3. In conclusion, the first instance judgment is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.