All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Defendant A agreed to take over the vehicle of the victim C (the age of 33) and agreed to receive four million won from the victim. Defendant A stated that “A, who is the branch of the instant charge, asked Defendant B, “A, who did not pay the money, did not pay the money, so that he can pay the money rapidly with the fact that he did not receive the money from the victim.”

At around 20:25 on July 31, 2012, the Defendants found the case in the North-gu D Emergency Hospital at the port, and Defendant A waiting around the area. Defendant B took the victim working in the emergency room at the above hospital as the parking lot of the above hospital, and Defendant B took the bath, such as “AC is promptly paid with money, why is he is paid off, and the knife is paid promptly, and the knife is paid promptly.”

Defendant B continued to collect money from the parents of the victim and carried the victim on the part of the defendant's vehicle in the north-gu E area in the north-gu E area in the port of one and the victim was in front of the U.S. F high school in the port of one of the port of one-way, and then the victim re-influences the victim in front of the U.S. F. E area in one of the port of one-way.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to threaten the victim.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim may be acknowledged to have withdrawn his/her intent to punish the Defendants on April 8, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case, and the prosecution of this case against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.