logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.02.06 2014재나43
부동산매매계약무효확인
Text

1. Among the lawsuits for retrial of this case, the grounds for retrial under Article 451(1)6, 7, and 9 of the Civil Procedure Act are respective.

Reasons

1. The following facts, which became final and conclusive in the judgment subject to review, are remarkable in this court, or are not disputed between the parties.

On June 27, 2002, the Plaintiff, an agent of the Defendant, entered into a model contract for the Plaintiff. On June 27, 2002, the Plaintiff: (a) concluded a model contract for the Plaintiff; (b) on June 27, 2002, the Plaintiff filed a sales contract for the purchase price of KRW 495,400,00 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”); and (c) filed a new contract for the purchase of the Plaintiff, including the details of the settlement of compensation and relocation expenses; and (d) filed a new contract for the purchase; (b) filed a subsequent claim for the registration of the transfer of the Plaintiff’s land ownership with the District Court 2003No4763,00,000; and (c) filed a subsequent claim for the registration of the transfer of the Plaintiff’s land ownership under the instant contract for the repayment of KRW 300,000,000,000 with the Plaintiff’s counterclaim as the Plaintiff’s 203.

B. On May 11, 2005, the Plaintiff appealed as Suwon District Court Decision 2004Na14557 (principal lawsuit), and 2004Na14564 (Counterclaim), but the judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s appeal (hereinafter “the judgment of review”) was rendered. The Plaintiff appealed as to the judgment of review in Supreme Court Decision 2005Da28921 (principal lawsuit) and Supreme Court Decision 2005Da28938 (Counterclaim), but the judgment of review became final and conclusive on December 9, 2005.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's summary of the assertion.

arrow