Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for a period of one and half years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a SP area B.

On November 11, 2018, the defendant driving the above car at around 21:10, and driving the above car at around 21:10, and driving the three-lane in front of the C Apartment Ddong at the time of light lighting, one-lane from the boundary of the iron mountain to the luminous intersection, and driving at the speed of the US.

At the time, there is a night and a place where the center line of the yellow-line is installed, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by thoroughly driving the motor vehicle driving person in front and safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the front part of the car driven by the Defendant, which was driven by the Victim E (the 66-year-old) (the 66-year-old) who was going straight in the two-lane opposite direction due to the negligence of the Defendant driving the center line.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the said victim E, such as satisfying and closing satching, etc., which requires approximately four weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence, and at the same time caused the death of the said victim G (the age of 28) on November 11, 2018 when he was on board the said taxi, due to low blood transfusion shock in the International Hospital Emergency Service Center in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, where he was under treatment for transmission at around 2:03.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A death certificate and each medical certificate (E);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. In light of the circumstances where the victims died or were relatively serious injuries due to traffic accidents with the central line of reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant is at a disadvantage.