A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

Around September 7, 2011, the Defendant entered into an agreement on the verification of technology (MOU) with the victim D and the joint venture (E) of the 14th floor of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, “E shall not proceed with any investment attraction or joint venture contract through a third party, without C’s consent, within the period during which this Understanding becomes effective, including the period of the verification of technology under this Understanding, including the period of the verification of technology under this Understanding; “C shall make the conclusion of this Understanding and the completion of the offer of security under paragraph (5) below, to lend 200 million won to E”; and “E shall return to 200 million won in the event of a joint venture project after the verification of technology. If it is deemed that the results of the verification of technology under this Understanding are not satisfactory or it is difficult to continue commercialization in the future even after the normal completion of the verification of technology, the 200 million won loans to E shall be returned to C within 15 days after the notification of the non-joint venture project by C.”

However, from the date of the first half of 201, the Defendant entered into a joint venture agreement with the State (State) on September 9, 201, which was after this framework from the date of the conclusion of the Statement of Understanding on Technology Verification (MU), with the State (State). Around that time, the Defendant borrowed 500 million won from the State (State). A joint venture corporation (State) was established around November 29, 201, and around November 29, 201.

In addition, the Defendant, around September 7, 201, bears 300 million won as loans owed to the Bank, 100 million won as loans owed to the Bank, and 100 million won as loans owed to bond dealers, and began to proceed with the auction procedure with respect to the Defendant’s research institute due to the above obligations, and the employee’s wages were not paid for three months, so there was no intention or ability to return 200 million won to the Bank within 15 days after the notice of the non-joint venture.

The Defendant, as such, was issued 200 million won as a loan to the victim by deceiving the victim, and then received 200 million won from the victim.

(i) the evidence;