logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.07.21 2015고단1059
일반교통방해등
Text

1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of 105 senior group of 2015, group of 1059, and imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of 2015 senior group of 3511, supra.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A of the Daejeon District Court on February 19, 2014, sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor and two years of suspended execution on December 24, 2014, which became final and conclusive on December 24, 2014.

1. On July 7, 2014, the Defendant reported to the head of the branch office D branch of the Public Transport and Transportation Joint Headquarters D; on July 6, 2014, to the head of the Daejeon Seo-gu Police Station as “the date and time of assembly on July 10, 2014 through 06:00, to August 6, 2014, 06:00 of the date and time of assembly; “50 meters in delivery to each E-mail, correspondence, and correspondence respectively”; “AD of the organizer and supervisor of the assembly; “A representative of the host organization;” “A” of the organizer and supervisor of the host organization; “the methods of demonstration, banner, placard, relief and promotion of relief;” “the representative of the host/ host organization; and “10 persons, such as cargo workers’ funds to participate in the assembly”.

Despite the fact that the organizer of an assembly or demonstration should not engage in any act clearly deviating from the scope of the reported purpose, date, time, place, method, etc., on July 14, 2014, the Defendant was holding the above assembly, which was reported with 40 members of the union in front of the E-dong, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, with 13:30 on July 14, 2014, the Defendant occupied the road of four-lanes in front of the East-gu, the place of the demonstration that was not reported from around 14:30 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an act clearly deviating from the scope of the reported place of assembly.

2. The Defendants conspired with the intent to hold an assembly in front of the E-dong, as described in paragraph 1, in collusion with the Defendants’ joint crime. Defendant A instructed Defendant B to park the four-lanes of the above road using H5 tons cargo vehicles at the above-mentioned location at around the night of the day, and Defendant B interfered with traffic by preventing the vehicle from driving by parking the above cargo vehicles in accordance with the foregoing direction.

Defendant A, “2015 Highest 3511,” in collusion with the I, J, K, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, T, and M, the causes of the labor union belonging to the cargo solidarity.

arrow