Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiffs are rental car companies, and the defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract for Branchising automobiles owned by them with creative education.
B. A, around 18:07 on July 4, 2015, around 18:07, operated a new card Co., Ltd. (long-term LesseeD) E-bened car at the parking lot located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan, and became an accident that conflicts with the said B-do car which was in progress.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
A On July 9, 2015, between Plaintiff Crenk Co., Ltd., Ltd., the same year from July 13:5, 2015 to July 13:55, 2015 between the name of the vehicle and the name of the vehicle, flass (G), flass (H), California (H), and the rental period.
8. 1. up to 16:30, rent 32,17,120 won (=45,881,600 won per day x 1,927,800 won per day x 6.1,542,200 won) x 70% of the claim rate x the above vehicle. After the lease period expires, the above vehicle was used on August 1, 2015 between the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. and the Non-Indictedick for the purpose of the lease and the period from August 1, 2015;
8. up to 15:20, rent 2,897,370 won (=4,139,100 won (7 days x 591,300 won per day x 70%)) was entered into, and used the above vehicle.
On the other hand, in relation to the instant accident, the Seoul Central District Court filed an application with the Seoul Central District Court for conciliation against the card company to the effect that “the liability for damages against the card of creative education with respect to the instant accident is 1,745,040 won (i.e., repair cost of KRW 575,040,000) (i.e., repair cost of KRW 1,170,000) (No more than 2015,52078).” On September 18, 2015, the said court rendered a decision in lieu of conciliation that “the liability for damages against the card of creative education with respect to the instant accident shall not exceed KRW 1,745,040,040,” and the said decision became final and conclusive around that time.
[Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap's 1 to 1.