The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation as to this case is as follows, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance as to the Defendants, except for partial revision as follows. Thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of

The last 17th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance is revised to "(1) first, as to whether Defendant E is liable for damages under Article 758 of the Civil Act as the possessor of the instant building and the possession assistant of the entire building of this case."

In full view of the facts that Defendant E, as the possessor of the instant building No. 101 in connection with the instant accident, cannot be deemed to bear the liability for damages caused by the defect in the construction or preservation thereof, in addition, even if Defendant E is an occupying assistant of the entire building of this case, as alleged by the Plaintiff, he cannot be deemed to bear the liability for damages as the possessor of the structure under Article 758 of the Civil Act in the position of the occupying assistant under the position of the occupying assistant.

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and all of the appeals by the plaintiff is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.