logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.07.18 2016나58038
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the implementation of the registration procedure for ownership transfer on each of the following grounds: (a) the restoration of real name and the preparatory completion of acquisition by prescription; and (b) the first instance court dismissed the primary claim and accepted the preliminary claim.

As the defendant appealed, the object of this Court's trial is limited to the conjunctive claim.

2. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow