1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) receives KRW 20,000,000 from the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s real estate listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant building”)

(B) On January 13, 2011, the owner of the instant building and the Defendant are 94 square meters (310.74 square meters) of the (g) section shop (hereinafter referred to as the “instant store”) located in the instant building in sequence that connects each point of the attached drawings No. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, and 25 attached to the second floor of the instant building.

(i) deposit 30 million won (20 million won out of the security deposit shall be paid up to the date of occupancy, the unpaid amount shall be paid up to April 30, 201, and the interest rate of the unpaid amount shall be 9 percent (9%) per annum on the unpaid amount shall be included in rent.

() A lease contract was concluded by setting a monthly rent of KRW 1,545,70 (excluding value-added tax), management fee of KRW 4,900 (excluding value-added tax), and the period from January 13, 201 to December 31, 201, during which the lease contract was renewed each year thereafter, and then renewed the lease contract to KRW 1,592,100 (excluding value-added tax) on December 31, 201, and the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

AB concluded the agreement.

B. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant confirmed that the instant building was scheduled to be newly constructed or reconstructed, and that it may be sold or demolished for new construction or reconstruction at the same time, and sought explanation from the owner of the building or his/her agent at the same time, and that if the owner of the building for new construction or reconstruction requires an explanation of the intention of the shop, the lease agreement is terminated, the lessee promises to order the store and not to claim the renewal of the contract, and the lessee has been notified of the rebuilding plan on January 2017, and accordingly, plans to the effect that construction may take place for about 24 months at the time of removal of the instant building, and that the return of the object of lease should be followed, and that this is effective as the lease agreement.

C. The Plaintiff’s agent on November 22, 2018.