The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not in itself infringe the victim’s structure, and thus, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged was erroneous.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, witness D of the court below was using the victim's computer at the time of entering the investigation agency to the court of the court below, and the victim took the bottom of the defendant's clothes, and made a detailed and consistent statement at the time of the occurrence of the crime of this case, and the victim's statement corresponds to the seizure protocol, seizure list, and each photograph of damaged articles, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed the crime of this case. Thus, the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts is without merit.

(3) The defendant asserted that the defendant's clothes stored at the time of the instant case were his own clothes, but it is difficult to understand that the clothes owned by the defendant, consistent with the victim and the defendant, reached four points, considering that the defendant escaped at the end of the ditches with the victim, and submitted photographs that the victim possessed the previous damaged items, etc., it is difficult to obtain the defendant's appeal.