logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.08.12 2014고단927
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

One (Evidence No. 1) and one knife (Evidence No. 2) shall be confiscated, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest927]

1. Around 08:00 on June 15, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) followed a disturbance, such as: (a) under the influence of alcohol, following the Defendant’s dwelling in front of the Defendant’s dwelling in Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu; (b) while taking a bath, following the Defendant’s booming of each item; and (c) the victim D (58 years of age) who was frighted to the sound, “I am without a frier’s death; (d) I am frily. I am hick. I am for the reason that I am hick, which is a dangerous thing in his possession, with the victim’s head, left part, and left part of the body of the victim one time, and string the victim, such as the number of days of her hair in treatment.”

2. At around 08:20 on June 15, 2014, the Defendant of special obstruction of performance of official duties threatened F with the Defendant’s attempt to arrest the Defendant in flagrant offender by using a knife knife, which is a dangerous thing (No. 2, a knife length, 22 cm in total length, 32.5 cm in total length), and threatened F with the Defendant’s warning that F would emit an electric gun, and thereby, interfere with F’s legitimate execution of duties relating to the arrest of police officers by carrying a dangerous knife carrying the knife, carrying the knife, which is a dangerous thing.

[2014 Highest 979] On June 7, 2014, the Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting, on the ground that, around 11:05, the Defendant was at the main point of “H” located in Ansan-gu, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, and that, upon receiving 112 a report, the Defendant recommended that he would go out of the said main point, and that he would go out of the 112 station, and that he would go out of the said main point, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of the reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow