logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.28 2013나2031524
사업권양도대금
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall, upon a request for change in exchange at the trial, be changed as follows:

The plaintiff.

Reasons

(b)the following:

Unit: 150,000,000 2-6 of the first intermediate payment contract, which includes the cost of payment for the division, other than the service cost, 200,000 ,000 2-6,000 2-6 of the first intermediate payment, the transfer of ownership 74,000,000 the third intermediate payment during March 2010 74,000 the second intermediate payment after the transfer of ownership during the period of March 2010 20.

(1) B shall notify A of the fact that he/she has appointed a person in charge of PM affairs.

B shall appoint a person who has expertise equivalent to each phase, in consideration of expertise in each phase of project, such as planning, design, and construction, as a person in charge.

At present, the representative director of Eul will perform the general PM business, and at the time of change, Gap can unilaterally terminate this service contract.

In such cases, B shall not raise any objection.

* Matters of special agreement (1) This PM contract is a PM contract concluded between A and B on November 6, 2009 for the efficient promotion of a package sale contract between A and B, and at the same time this PM agreement is concluded, and at the same time, a package sale contract concluded on November 6, 2009 is automatically terminated.

(2) This contract shall be borne within KRW 80,000 if the total project cost exceeds KRW 11,344,00,000 on the detailed statement of the analysis of the balance of each apartment-type factory project proposed by Eul as a project for the project cost analysis of the balance of projects conducted by Eul, and shall be paid after deducting the amount in excess of the project cost from the amount in excess of the amount in excess of the project cost through settlement after completion.

(3) A service contract for the vicarious execution of a project concluded on December 21, 2009 shall lose its effect simultaneously with the conclusion of this Agreement.

On February 25, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant completed and maintained the instant building from the business planning to the Plaintiff.

arrow