Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On June 5, 2012, around 13:05, the Defendant committed assault against the victim’s right side at one time to the right side of the victim, on the ground that the victim, who is a member of the same church, went against the victim D (at the age of 48) and the church problem, and the victim went against the “pon.”

Accordingly, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as “influorum salt, cluorum salt, cluorum 3/4, 4/5, 5/6 of the cluorum,” and “influoral exit of a baby” that requires the victim’s treatment for 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate and diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, which can be seen by comprehensively taking account of each evidence of the reasons for conviction under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act: (a) the victim made a consistent statement from the investigative agency to this court that he/she suffered an injury, such as a chloe, f, etc., by having been assaulted by the defendant; (b) the witness E and F stated that the defendant had been present at the time of facing the victim’s face by drinking in this court; and (c) the defendant was also aware of the fact that he/she was under investigation by the police after being investigated by the police, and was aware that he/she was protruding out of drinking, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated

Of the facts charged in the instant case, as indicated in the facts charged, the part that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by “satisfying infection” is recognized as having suffered a chronic satchitis by the Defendant’s assault only with the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.