beta
Text
1. The sentence against the accused shall be 2,000,000 won;
2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a real representative of E, a specialized construction business company specializing in soil and steel reinforced concrete works, etc., and F is an employee of the same company, who has been the director in charge of management.
Defendant
On April 2015, E Co., Ltd., which was operated by A, received notification of termination of the contract for reasons such as delay of construction, etc. on March 24, 2017, when entering into a subcontract agreement with G with respect to civil engineering and steel reinforced concrete works among the multi-levelized construction of the H national highway connection department, which was ordered by the Chungcheong Headquarters of the Daejeon National Highway Corporation, Korea, and that it succeeded to the status of contractor from G while entering into a subcontract agreement with G.
Therefore, the defendant and the F had the mind to interfere with the work of the damaged party by preventing the field office managed by the injured party in order to recover the claim for the construction cost of E and to claim the illegality of the termination of the contract.
1. On March 30, 2017, Defendant A, from around 14:00 to around 18:00 on March 30, 2017, ordered F to call up one of the above site offices to prevent the employees belonging to the victim company from entering the entrance of the site office held by the victim company located in Seocho-si from around 14:00 to around 18:00, on the ground that the contract for construction of the victim company could not be terminated, and the contract was not terminated, and thus, he could not receive construction payment.
Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with F and thereby interfered with the work of the victim company by force.
2. From April 4, 2017 to April 14, 2017, Defendant A instructed F to prevent the entrance of an on-site office in the same manner as that set forth in paragraph 1 at the same place as that set forth in paragraph 1 from around April 14:30 to around 15:20, and F prevented F from entering the site of employees belonging to the victim company in the same manner as set forth in paragraph 1.
Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with F and thereby interfered with the work of the victim company by force.