logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.03.27 2012고정295
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

1. Around February 25, 2009, at the point near the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Office, the head of the Tong in the name of the defendant was opened, and the head of the Tong and the cash card connected thereto was assigned to C at the same time, and the means of access was assigned.

2. Around February 25, 2009, at a point near the Yang Jae-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the head of the foreign exchange bank D account in the name of the defendant was opened, and the head of the Tong and the cash card connected thereto was sent to C at that point, and the means of access was assigned.

3. Around February 25, 2009, at the point near the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yang Jae-dong, one bank E account opened under the name of the defendant at the point near the Han Bank Inter-dong, and provided C with such passbook and cash card connected thereto, and transferred the means of access by informing C of such passbook and cash card.

4. Around March 23, 2009, at the Sung-nam branch, the head of the Tong-gu F account in the name of the Defendant was opened, and the head of the Tong and the cash card connected thereto was sent the means of access by informing C of the head of the Tong and the cash card connected thereto.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit transactions;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and the choice of punishment, and Articles 49 (4) 1 and 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (Selection of Fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of this case has been committed four times, and the defendant has a number of criminal records of a fine.

arrow